Jump to content
I Forge Iron

Carcinogens?


Recommended Posts

Recently I watched a video on a man making charcoal, and when he was handling the finished product mentioned that he should have been wearing gloves as the charcoal is carcinogenic? It was pine lump charcoal. I was under the strong impression that charcoal was not a carcinogen, and, if it was, I don't think wearing leather gloves would protect you much. I am aware that eating overcooked food cooked with manufactured briquettes could be carcinogenic due to the added ingredients, but am extremely doubtful of this mans statement in the video. Could anybody offer some insight?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not any kind of expert but from what I've read and understand charcoal is essentially carbon. It's what's left after everything else has burn out of the wood. If carbon was a carcinogenic we would all be sick all the time since we are carbon based. Can you tell us where you found the video? I'd be interested in seeing it myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think every substance known ( and unknown) to man is considered a carcinogen by the State of California.

I even saw the sign on a Mcdonalds in California: this building contains chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer and other reproductive harm, yadda yadda yadda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dont lick the charcoal. 

I've had hardwood lump in my mouth before and it wasn't very tasty lol. Since then I've made sure to break it differently.

Graeson, if you look at the video comments they're havin a similar discussion there about the 'carcinogenic' nature of charcoal.

Edited by M Cochran
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I might say, in the sceam of things, charcoal (and even coal) are relitivly begnighn compared to what is put in to our food and water. Did you know that floride and clorine water treatments are also known carsegines? Not to mention contaminents, pestiside residues etc.  one is more in danger of serius mental ilnes from woring about everything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10.1.3. Fixed carbon content

The fixed carbon content of charcoal ranges from a low of about 50% to a high or around 95%. Thus charcoal consists mainly of carbon. The carbon content is usually estimated as a "difference"; that is to say, all the other constituents are deducted from 100 as percentages and the remainder is assumed to be the % of "pure" or "fixed" carbon. The fixed carbon content is the most important constituent in metallurgy since it is the fixed carbon which is responsible for reducing the iron oxides of the iron ore to produce metal. But the industrial user must strike a balance between the friable nature of high fixed carbon charcoal and the greater strength of charcoal with a lower fixed carbon and higher volatile matter content to obtain optimum blast furnace operation.

 

but yes, some of the volitiles that may not be compleatly converted to carbon may be carsinegenic, so dont lick the charcoal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a program on Food Network recently that had one of the "famous" chefs cooking a steak directly on WOOD charcoal (not briquettes), then instructing you to not worry if the charcoal sticks to it because of the final step, when you remove the steak from the charcoal, brush off the bigger pieces but purposely leave the smaller ones on, then wrap the whole thing in foil and wait for 10 minutes for it to finish cooking AND to disintegrate the charcoal pieces into a "lovely sauce" for the steak.    Looked delish but the part about eating the charcoal-turned-"sauce" gave me a moment's pause, though I'm not sure why. 

Edited by SpankySmith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Compared to the dangers of driving my car to work every day; most other dangers are down a couple of orders of magnitude.  Smoke is a lot more toxic than charcoal so try to get the fully charred charcoal rather than the "flavourful stuff".  I shudder to think what I'm ingesting when I cook lamb over a rosemary wood fire; hasn't stopped me yet though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh huh, charcoal carcinogens, sort of up there with the other fads isn't it? Gluten being the big one right now, we don't want to eat a higher food value food if something like 3 in 10,000 are allergic do we? Everywhere I go I meet people who are self diagnosing using "clinically" proven or shown results as proofs. Anyone can have or be a "clinic" just get some people together, make up some process and you can tell people it's "clinically shown" or "proven" without actually committing fraud.

If charcoal were carcinogenic the CDC, AMA and California Board of Health would make Kingsford and all the others label their packaging. Briquettes use various polymers to let them be pressed into briquettes, some use powdered coal, some use wood pulp, some milk glue like "Elmer's." If commercial briquettes don't contain carcinogens in reportable quantities what's the chances of unadulterated lump charcoal does? Sure, don't make charcoal our of lumber painted with lead paint, heck ANY paint. Pealing the bark is a good idea especially birch to avoid creosote when coaling.

Chicken Little Pah. Unless chunks of sky start hitting the ground . . . Well, okay stay out of the smoke, ANY smoke.

Frosty The Lucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well they used to prosecute the makers of radium water if they had less than the stated amount in their water.

I once read an article in Smithsonian I believe about a fellow who really believed in the stuff and suffered a gruesome end after drinking large amounts over a prolonged time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He will be referring to a media scare a few years ago about charred meat being possibly carcinogenic.  Likely got twisted around like these things do before it got back to him.  Charcoal is not considered carcinogenic according to anything I've read in my veterinary texts.  Any smoke is carcinogenic because it is a mucosal irritant and any irritant that leads to increased cell turnover can cause an increased risk of cancer because every cell replication could have a DNA mutation.  Basically a cell not replicating is less likely to have it's DNA damaged and it passed on to other cells. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...