Dewnmoutain Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 ollie hammer? or oliver hammer? Or treadle hammer? i forget It's got an 8lb sledge on it. My original hammer head was a 13lb, but it was really weirdly shaped and needs more work to make it usable. Just the couple times ive used it, i know i need to make the foot pedal longer because it forces me to be a bit unbalanced when i kick with my foot, and it's not allowing me to center my material when i hammer, allowing for mishits. But when it hits true, it really hits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHCC Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 Yep, treadle hammer. Some people call it an Oliver, after one particular model of treadle hammer -- in other words, all Olivers are treadle hammers, but not all treadle hammers are Olivers. I just call mine "the nodding donkey" and leave it at that. Great tool; it was a total game changer for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frosty Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 Yeah, that looks pretty Olliver to me. Like all tools we make for ourselves a little tweaking and refinement will happen as you use it. Good job, keep it up. Frosty The Lucky. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dewnmoutain Posted September 14, 2021 Author Share Posted September 14, 2021 well, i thought id resurrect this old post as it pertains directly to this hammer. because of injury, i now have the (forced) free time to contemplate and work on this hammer. so after a couple months of using this hammer, it was annoying me that no matter how hard id stomp my foot to get the hammer to impact the hot steel, it wasnt leaving much of a mark on the steel. my initial testing and uses were with pieces 1/4 to 3/8ths thick, so the hammer would do the job. But when i moved up above 1/2", especially 1" variety, the hammer wasnt hitting as "hard" as i thought it would. i monkied with the setup some more, and just couldnt, at first, figure out what was causing the softening. So, i just hung the thing up and said "meh, ill get to it later". That was back in January. Had a friend come over, and using my army tenacity and his nuclear engineering thinking, we figured out that the culprit is the springs itself. Turns out, they dont move until they have a 20+ lb load applied to them. So, they are too "weighty" (or resistant?). i scrounged through my scrap steel, and found some old springs, but they too, have a higher load limit in the 20+ lb range. so i thought id ask here, since i now have the free time to work on this, does anyone know where i can pick up some weak springs? ive already hit up the local hardware store, and the ones i picked up were also wound tight and would only extend half way out with a 20lb weight on them. i tried looking at some online websites that sell springs, but this is where my knowledge of choosing a spring is very lacking. anybody have experience with finding or buying the types of springs im talking about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasPowers Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 Screen Door Springs? Make the mount so you can add and subtract them to get the force you need. They are also designed to stretch out a lot in their normal use! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goods Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 Might sound strange, but try shortening you connection points and put both springs in the picture on linked together end to end. That should give much more weight reaction. I believe the calculation for springs constants in series is the same as electrical resistors in parallel. David Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Evans Posted December 23, 2021 Share Posted December 23, 2021 Try moving the spring connection further down the the shaft away from the hammer head...you will have more leverage against the spring... My return springs are off a pulley on the end of the hammer pivot spindle, and from memory is only Ø8-10" so the connection point is effectively 4" or 5" from the fulcrum. I never reckoned you could get the same clout out of a foot hammer as you could from a hand hammer for drawing down etc. Standing on one leg and stamping down with the other is not the most efficient way of delivering energy by the body. What I use it for is the finesse of striking with both hands free to manipulate top tools and workpiece. And that was even before I had a power hammer Just found some photos and a sketch with dimensions if it helps. Alan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Evans Posted December 24, 2021 Share Posted December 24, 2021 The springs only have to lift the weight of the hammer against gravity and no more, a very light touch required. The hammer does not need to be held at rest at the full height of the stroke. The stroke of my hammer can be well over 20" when cycling but static is 15". With your existing connection points something like a long length of bungee cord may provide that and not fight you so much? It is 50 odd years since I first found the bits of shafting, plummer blocks and old car seat belts at the scrap yard to make my foot hammer, and just looking at it now I see I had forgotten some of the subtleties I had tried to incorporate in the operating and return linkage. I was aware that with most (all?) spring return foot hammers the spring pressure increased as the hammer descends and it reduces your strike energy...you're fighting it all the way down. In the early 1970s I had probably heard of the compound bow invention which accelerated and increased power as the arrow went forward, and although I didn't know how it worked I made an attempt towards that concept in spirit if not mechanically. My contribution was that the bottom spring attachment is on the opposite side of the treadle fulcrum so as the pedal goes down the spring goes up and the tension fighting against you is slightly reduced. Now 50 years later I know how the compound bow cam wheels work, and also the oval Shimano bicycle chain wheels....I think it would be interesting to modify the pulley shape to a cam on my hammer design to further improve the treadle down and return spring dynamics. Something for a younger man to explore! Alan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VoldemarDemid Posted May 22, 2024 Share Posted May 22, 2024 On 24.12.2021 at 02:50, Alan Evans said: Попробуйте переместить пружинное соединение дальше по валу от головки молотка... у вас будет больше рычагов воздействия на пружину... Мои возвратные пружины сняты со шкива на конце шпинделя шарнира молотка, и, насколько я помню, их диаметр составляет всего 8–10 дюймов, поэтому точка соединения фактически находится на расстоянии 4 или 5 дюймов от точки опоры. Я никогда не предполагал, что от ножного молотка можно получить такой же удар, как от ручного молотка для опускания и т. д. Стоять на одной ноге и топать другой — не самый эффективный способ передачи энергии телу. Я использую его для того, чтобы научиться ловко наносить удары обеими свободными руками, чтобы манипулировать верхними инструментами и заготовкой. И это было еще до того, как у меня появился электромолот. Только что нашел несколько фотографий и эскиз с размерами, если поможет. Алан Good afternoon. Please tell me the distance from the floor level to the axis of rotation. There is the height of the front column. There is a distance from the level of the striker to the hanging hammer. But there is no height of the rear column, at what level should the axis of rotation be? Thank you in advance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHCC Posted May 22, 2024 Share Posted May 22, 2024 That depends on four things: the height of your anvil, the average size of your workpieces, the height of the tooling (if any) you'll be using with the hammer, and the distance from the face of the hammer to the center of its eye. Add those four numbers together, and that's the height of the center of the axis of rotation. The reason for this is that you want the hammer face to hit the tooling as close to perpendicular as possible. If it comes down at an angle, it's less efficient, and you run the risk of losing control of the tool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.