Jump to content
I Forge Iron

I assume it was made this way


Recommended Posts

Note the lack of pritchel, compact form, sharp topped feet. So probably pre 1820's and possibly within the made by hand with tilt hammers standards.

What I'm wondering is 30 CWT would be over 3000 pounds as it's supposed to be a traveling anvil my guess it's an 3 0 or 84 pounds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Location is Ulverston, Lake District, It could have been made like that so that as the smiddy was on a hilly area, the face was level as the floor was on a slope. (Probably one explanation)

Or the 'smith had one leg shorter than the other. (Probably explanation two)

Any more suggestions out there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen a couple Mousehole anvils like that. I doubt any smith could hit an anvil of that type of construction (built up wrought iron with a steel face) and not break off the horn. This would happen long before the core block of the anvil upset enough to make it that out of whack. Im not sure that is even possible to make cold metal that thick deform like that with hand hammers even if John Henry himself were striking for you. My guess is it was a some what common mistake that sometimes happened wile they made their anvils. They were deemed "good enough" Perhaps they were sold at a discount or as seconds. After all, all that would be needed to rectify the problem would to be to cut the stump at a slight angle or put a shim under it. Honestly a sloped anvil would not really impede any forging process I can think of as long as you can hold your work on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's an "anti-spectator" anvil.
It's canted just enough to make the lookee-loos tilt their heads. When they discover they've got a crook in their neck from watching, they move on.dry.gif
At the historic site I worked at, when we had a "know it all" in the shop, we'd give a signal and one of the other smiths would put a piece of sheet metal in the vise then start filing on the edge of it - after about 30 seconds of that premium sound, the "expert" would high-tail it outta there!

That being said, I'm thinking Southshore has it right . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a not often seen Hot Rod anvil. Being high in the back, and low in the front, it gave a sporty look to the smithy. They were used in speed forging competitions of old.

Either that , or it was made that way to allow the prodigious amounts rainfall that are common in the UK to run off, and not puddle on the face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the picture again......Is that a CRACK or a demarcation line all the way around the waist?? Could this be a repair job gone wrong???

Also, look at each side of the anvil. The side profile curve is more extended on one side verses the other. I really believe this anvil has been through a really bad repair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Look at the picture again......Is that a CRACK or a demarcation line all the way around the waist?? Could this be a repair job gone wrong???

Also, look at each side of the anvil. The side profile curve is more extended on one side verses the other. I really believe this anvil has been through a really bad repair.

This kind of anvil does not have a seem around the waist. The body of the anvil is a large block of wrought iron with the horn, heal and feet forge welded to it. Only later anvils were made with the weld seem across the waist.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


This kind of anvil does not have a seem around the waist. The body of the anvil is a large block of wrought iron with the horn, heal and feet forge welded to it. Only later anvils were made with the weld seem across the waist.


That's my point, so if what I'm seeing in the picture is some kind of demarcation line at the waist, could this be a repair gone wrong, causing the raked anvil??
Link to comment
Share on other sites


That's my point, so if what I'm seeing in the picture is some kind of demarcation line at the waist, could this be a repair gone wrong, causing the raked anvil??


An anvil of this style of construction is extremely unlikely to have to have cracked across the waist. It would have taken a ridiculous amount of force to sever a solid block if wrought iron across the grain like that. Lets say it was a 3 1/2" by 5" by 10 core block that the anvil was built around and wrought iron fails at 60,000 PSI more or less thats virtually impossible in my book. Unless some one sawed it in half then cut out a wedge and welded it back together. Then they cleaned the weld to make it look like 200 year old wrought iron. I suppose its possible but why?
Link to comment
Share on other sites


An anvil of this style of construction is extremely unlikely to have to have cracked across the waist. It would have taken a ridiculous amount of force to sever a solid block if wrought iron across the grain like that. Lets say it was a 3 1/2" by 5" by 10 core block that the anvil was built around and wrought iron fails at 60,000 PSI more or less thats virtually impossible in my book. Unless some one sawed it in half then cut out a wedge and welded it back together. Then they cleaned the weld to make it look like 200 year old wrought iron. I suppose its possible but why?


Mild steel is about 36ksi, so I think wrought is a little less. Otherwise I agree, breaking this is near impossible.

It looks like there is a wrinkle or blemish at the waist on one side (first picture). The blemish is in a very straight line most of the way across the waist. I suspect that could be from manufacture or from use over the years with something rubbing that spot for some reason.

Phil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First picture: note that the top section of the side seems to have deeper pitting/weathering. My guess is the "line" folks are seeing is the transition line from where that anvil laid on it's side for a long time with the top part sunk into the muck and the bottom part propped up on the feet and so not as much in contact with the pitting agents!

How about that for a WAG!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


First picture: note that the top section of the side seems to have deeper pitting/weathering. My guess is the "line" folks are seeing is the transition line from where that anvil laid on it's side for a long time with the top part sunk into the muck and the bottom part propped up on the feet and so not as much in contact with the pitting agents!

How about that for a WAG!


Nice Wag! I guess this is possible. Still, something just isn't right with this anvil. Unless it had an intended purpose to be raked, I just don't believe it came from the factory in this manner. Makes for an interesting research topic......
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps this was one of the early self-cleaning anvils. Normally the smith would take time to occasionally brush the accumulated scale etc. off the face. To save time for the busy worker, the tilted face allowed this detrius to work its way off the edge of the face as the anvil vibrated from hammer blows. In common with the later self-cleaning oven, this probably didn't actually work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...