Jump to content
I Forge Iron

Sellers 2 1/2 Ton Steam Hammer


Recommended Posts

2929645800033749120S600x600Q85.jpg
I have the chance to save this 2 1/2 ton Sellers hammer and move it up to Youngstown to the Tod Engine Heritage Park. My plan is to reinstall it as a working piece, so I am curious as to what the foundations for these big hammers looked like. I believe they would be set upon a foundation of cribbed timber. None of my books have any details about big hammer installation, so I thought I would come here to ask for advice. Have any of you seen a foundation drawing for a big hammer that could be shared?

Thanks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no idea what the original foundation would be but, what about looking into newer materials being used for vibrating foundations. For some reason chipped, compressed rubber comes to mind. Some kind of engineered product. Might also help protect the other parts of the building from the vibrations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Anvil's Ring from sometime in the mid 80's had an article about someone setting up a big industrial hammer, IIRC bigger than yours. Might have had a few photos of foundations or forms for same. There may also have been an article or two on the huge hammer at the Bethlehem Steelworks. Will try to remember to look thru my back issues this weekend to pin it down some more. It'll be a LOT of concrete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you contact a forge shop, and ask them? I believe Pacific Forge in Berkley Ca is still going, as well as others that may be closer to you.

When Mare Island Naval Shipyard closed, after 100+ years, a lot of neat old tools got sold, or scrapped. Not a lot of people think about industrial history, especially developers that have $$$$ in their eyes. Sell it, and clear it out is all they want.

One family day I got to see the steam hammers working in the forge shop. Still remember how the ground shook when they would hit hard, yet could also just tap the piece if need be. Lots of control, and lots of skill. I got the 18.5"x78" Axelson lathe out of my Dad's classroom, but couldn't afford the platen table. :( Have yet to see another one that thick, must have been 8"-10".

Anyway, I hope you can save it, and get the info that you need to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe any copy of "Machinery Handbook" with a edition number under 10 should have specs on what the foundation should be for a hammer of that size. I have a book somewhere in my storage lockup that is specifically on foundations for power hammers but I couldn't lay my hands on it if my life depended on it... There is likely a Google Books ebook with the info they are digitizing all kinds of old books;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There' an illustration of a hammer just like that one on page 16 of " Hammer Work " Originally published by International Textbook Co. 1906 reprinted by Lindsay Publications Inc. ISBN 1-55918-076-5.

There's a foundation plan on page 17 for a single arch hammer of comparable size . The anvil block is sitting on a deep stack of heavy timbers and the hammer itself is supported and bolted to heavy timbers sitting on massive brick piers.

There is also some discussion further on of the advantages and disadvantages of using elastic timber foundations as opposed to massive cast concrete foundations for large steam hammers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes that is the exact same hammer. A "Morrison" hammer it is called. That book was very helpful, thanks!

I took a good look at the hammer yesterday, and the base casting is 7' x 14' 6" with a square hole in the center in which the anvil sticks up through. There are six bolts holding down the base plate. It should come out fairly straightforward, assuming that I have enough lifting capacity.

There was another double frame hammer next to this one. The base plant and anvil still survive, and judging by the size of the base plate and the height of the cut off steam line it was about twice the size of the Morrison hammer. I'm glad its not there, or I would be trying to save it too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's nice to recommend that he buy and install the latest technology for the base of the hammer but that stuff ain't cheap. The best option maybe to continue using the original type of foundation and vibration isolation. I don't think they will be using the hammer all that much compared to what it was used in original production work any way. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very rare for hammers to be grouted in as the vibration quickly kills any grout. Generally they have either wood, vibration isolation material, or such under the base plate. The anvil however is more than likely going to be wedged into the foundation with tight fitting fitted wooden wedges, or concrete, or something just as difficult to remove. Allow time for removal of the anvil, the hammer itself is usually easy to remove, just undo the bolts and lift, anvils always are more taxing. Thats why you often see preserved hammers missing the anvil, people just lost interest once they realised the amount of work involved. Not trying to put you off Rick, just forwarned is forarmed. Anvils normally weighed 10 times the working weight (weight of falling parts) of the hammer, so 25 ton say for the anvil on this sucker. I saved a fair bit from the forge shop at BHP steelworks in Newcastle here before it was demolished, would have liked to get more, but money and time was not on my side.

post-5537-12698504206871_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...