rthibeau Posted December 31, 2008 Posted December 31, 2008 there are many hammers in the Gallery that would fall into the Art category Quote
nett Posted December 31, 2008 Posted December 31, 2008 Nathan Robertson's Diamonds in the Rough is, indeed, art. Quote
781 Posted January 1, 2009 Posted January 1, 2009 Nathan wouldnt be happy with a picture of his hammers and calling them art. Nathan says Homey dont do art Bad Roger in Minnesota Quote
bipolarandy Posted January 1, 2009 Author Posted January 1, 2009 nett, who made those? half of them look like they should be sent to the scrap pile. Quote
jayco Posted January 1, 2009 Posted January 1, 2009 How do you separate the art from the utility? I can look at well made tongs, or anvil, or hammer, for that matter, and say "That's beautiful". But I'm also thinking..........Gee! I could move some metal with that! Quote
steveh Posted January 1, 2009 Posted January 1, 2009 check out Elmer Roush's website,it shows a couple of hammers with carved faces in them that are available for sale. Quote
brucegodlesky Posted January 2, 2009 Posted January 2, 2009 There is a local iron shop with a 50# Little Giant as lawn art/advertising. And no, it isn't for sale :-) Quote
slippse Posted January 23, 2009 Posted January 23, 2009 instead of art deco it could be art whammo Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.