alwe1 Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 I found a Hay-Budden anvil that my grand father has had for years with the weight stamp of 107 and serial number of 192107. I was just wondering how old it was and if this weight is in English hundred weights or just pounds. I also have a Peter Wright stamped with peter wright patented then below that in a circle it says solid wrought and the numbers are 104 which I take to mean it weighs 116lbs I was wondering what the date on that anvil was as well. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LastRonin Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 Pics please. I can't help with the id, would just really enjoy seeing the pics of your finds (We all love pics :D). But, pics would very likely help those who CAN help you do just that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwe1 Posted February 14, 2014 Author Share Posted February 14, 2014 This is the Hay Budden In question. In very good shape Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwe1 Posted February 14, 2014 Author Share Posted February 14, 2014 This is currently my only picture of my Peter Wright I will post better soon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LastRonin Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 They both look nice. What are the weights? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwe1 Posted February 14, 2014 Author Share Posted February 14, 2014 The Peter Wright is marked 104 which I believe to mean it weighs 116lbs because they are marked in English hundred weights. The Hay Budden is marked 107 so its either 107lbs or 119lbs depending if they use pounds or English Hundred weights. If I am wrong on this someone please tell me as I have never had either of them on the scale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwe1 Posted February 14, 2014 Author Share Posted February 14, 2014 also if anyone can give me an approximate value of either or both of them that would be great Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkie Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 The Hay Budden is 107 pounds. They were stamped with the weight in pounds, not hundred weights. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwe1 Posted February 14, 2014 Author Share Posted February 14, 2014 Thank you for that I wasn't sure how they were marked. Also which is considered to be the better quality anvil of the two? And should I be actively using these like I am or should I be keeping them in their current condition? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkie Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 Thank you for that I wasn't sure how they were marked. Also which is considered to be the better quality anvil of the two? And should I be actively using these like I am or should I be keeping them in their current condition? Only the H B is in pounds, not both anvils. Both are excellent anvils. Put them to use! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwe1 Posted February 14, 2014 Author Share Posted February 14, 2014 Only the H B is in pounds, not both anvils I Knew What You meant but thanks for clarifying Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwe1 Posted February 14, 2014 Author Share Posted February 14, 2014 is anyone able to help me date and value these? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan C Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 As far as the age of the PW this thread may help you. http://www.iforgeiro...=+peter +wright Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasPowers Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 Note that the value in North Central Iowa is not the value in Central Ohio is not the value in southern New Mexico. Asking locally for local prices makes more sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metalmangeler Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 They are both nice useable anvils, I see no reason to think they should be saved as collectors items. If you are concerned that using them may damage them you could use an unhardened hammer, or you could use a hammer that has been slightly over tempered so that though hardened it will be noticeably softer than your anvils. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwe1 Posted February 14, 2014 Author Share Posted February 14, 2014 I have been using the PW and it seems to be in great working condition still. Would you believe that I got both of these anvils completely free :) just lucky I guess. Is there any popular opinion as to which is the better quality anvil? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan C Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 I'll be happy to try them out for you and let you know the results, just send them both down here to Texas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatfudd Posted February 15, 2014 Share Posted February 15, 2014 I think most smiths will be reluctant to tell you which is best because it really depends on how you will use them. Both are good anvils and both will serve you well. Personally, I prefer the HB in that I have rarely seen a HB with a severe sway on the face, whereas, I have seen many many more PWs with sway that makes them unusable. Now a days we are not subjecting anvils to the kinds of abuse that they used to receive back when they were were used for every imaginable purpose. As for value in Iowa I would imagine that if they are in good condition you MIGHT get $3/lb. In New Mexico $3 would be a pretty reasonable deal only because we don't have many decent used anvils here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quint Posted February 15, 2014 Share Posted February 15, 2014 I got my HB for $2/lb but I also lucked out. Around my area they go for anywhere from $2lb upward to $6/lb and this tends to have no real basis in quality or make. Its very random. Another issue is up here there are a few "collectors" "resellers" whom I dont think have day time jobs so it is very very difficult to pick up an anvil at a decent price. My personal preference would be for the HB just because the top half of the anvil (depending on date) is steel vise just a top plate which as Fudd pointed out can be the issue of the sway back. But then again Ive used my old PW for quiet a few blades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwe1 Posted February 15, 2014 Author Share Posted February 15, 2014 Thank you guys for the responses you have helped a ton. The face on the PW is nice and flat there is a few dings but no noticeable sway its a joy to use. Is there a chance that you guys could date the HB? I have the serial number posted at the top of this topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatfudd Posted February 15, 2014 Share Posted February 15, 2014 The birth date on the HB is 1912, the whole top half is tool steel. Nice anvil! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwe1 Posted February 17, 2014 Author Share Posted February 17, 2014 thank you so much :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.