Jump to content
I Forge Iron

-Quint-

Members
  • Posts

    108
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by -Quint-

  1. 16 hours ago, BlasterJoe said:

    Looks great. Where did you get the moose antler from? 

    I don't remember exactly where I got it, possibly eBay? I had it quite a while before I started this knife. But the company Mr. Powers posted looks like an excellent source, I just googled it and checked it out. They have pieces that look exactly like what I started with. Moose crown is big though, so expect to make a BIG knife lol. 

     

    IMG_2660.JPG

  2. I drill out what I can and then use files and these bad boys. Amazing how well they work on horn and bone. Then I soak the whole thing for 24 hrs in a cocktail of wood hardener, turpentine, whatever stain or dye I'm using and linseed oil.  

     

    IMG_4675.JPG

  3. Yeah I'm definitely not done messing with the blade finish. I had it finished, then got a different idea in my head (almost put plunge lines in, glad I didn't) and briefly put it back on the grinder...  then changed my mind about that and didn't take those grinder marks out yet. I'm waiting to finally make up my mind as far as what I want the finish to be, then I'll put on the finishing touches. Til then, it's staying this way. 

    As for the blackening stuff, it's from a company called EPI (Electrochemical Products, Inc.) and the product is called SS370. I got it several years ago to experiment on my stainless .45-70 lever gun and it worked so well achieving the old time look that I was going for that I used it on my stainless Vaquero .45 colt revolver as well and I was very pleased. They're an industrial company and only sell the stuff in huge quantities but I had asked for a sample and they gladly sold me 2 small jars (2 different viscosities, one liquid, one more of a loose gel). Anyway, I experimented with it on other metals, including plain steel and it does wonderful things, that is if "antiquing" stuff is your thing. 

  4. Thanks man I appreciate that, I keep trying different grits and finishes on the blade. I originally wanted more of a forge finish but all of my fiddling around wound up taking more of that off than I wanted to.This is how it looks now, I wanted a particular rough, old, used look to it. Left lots of marks in it and darkened it with some stainless steel blackening chemical I have. I'll probably refinish it a few more times lol.

    Went with a flat/convex grind after mostly forging the bevels to the finished geometry. Didn't want any plunge lines on this one, they can make a blade look too modern to me for some reason and I wanted this to look like it was found in the wilderness. It's full tang, heavy steel disk pommel set into the crown, cold peened on... what else, it's straight 5160, guard and pommel are mild steel. It's about 22" overall, 13-1/2" blade. It's BIG and heavy, but very well balanced. 

    IMG_4656.JPG

    IMG_4657.JPG

    IMG_4670.JPG

  5. Not sure what I like most about your posts/knives; your trademark use of a checkering file, that great patina you achieve on your blades, or the awesome background textures younusenin your photography! 

  6. On ‎2‎/‎11‎/‎2016 at 6:04 PM, j.w.s. said:

    Ok, you're not going to find a good metal working grinder with the name craftsman or dewalt attached to it. You want a 2x72 So save your pennies until you can afford one or you're going to be paying a huge "graduation tax" as you move up.. There's reasons why those of us who do this for a living don't use the smaller belts and there's probably about a hundred topics already covering it. Personally I'm not going to spoon feed you encouragement by helping to justify what youre thinking of getting. Pony up the money and do it right the first time.

    J

    I never considered a craftsman or dewalt. I'm dumb, but not dumb enough to think I'd find what I needed from something that every hardware store has. I did search for a topic specifically covering the differences between these particular belt sizes and there wasn't one. Probably because everyone around here is already smart enough to know that it's 2x72 or bust.

    I got a 2x48 attachment for my 1HP bench grinder and it's fantastic so far. If I'm ever good enough or smart enough to need more than what this is providing me I'll gladly pay a "graduation tax".

  7. 5 minutes ago, ThomasPowers said:

    I didn't either, I was trying to be Socratic not Sarcastic.  And HC spikes top out at the boundary of low carbon/medium carbon by the last specs I have gotten a hold of; so more like 1027 *NOT* 1045.

    Ah, thank you for the more accurate info. I don't recall where I read that they were 1045, but I'm sure it wasn't as reliable a source as you are. Now I won't forget. Not that I think I'll be messing with RR spikes once this batch I have now are each mangled into one thing or another, but ya never know...

  8. 1 hour ago, Charles R. Stevens said:

    "HC" spikes are still better than a copper axe, but as TP is alluding in his sarcasm, it's still recommended that you "steel" the edge of both axe and knife if you are making more than wall hangers. 

    Right now I'm just practicing. If I intended to make something potentially useful, I'd not take my chances with a RR spike.

    I didn't realize he was being sarcastic, I thought maybe he was curious about the particular spikes I have. I know even the highest carbon spikes out there aren't ideal for expecting great results from heat treatment, but as I said, I'm just practicing.

  9. 8 hours ago, ThomasPowers said:

    And how hard did it get?

    Well in my completely inexperienced opinion, the edge got pretty hard. A file and sandpaper don't bite it at all, it took a nice edge and has a nice audible ring to it when tapped. All very unscientific, I know. Honestly it seems to have hardened more than I expected it to. These spikes that I have are marked "HC", but I read somewhere that the HC just means that they're higher carbon than a standard spike, maybe around 1045? But that it doesn't really stand for HIGH CARBON.

     

    6 hours ago, JHCC said:

    Still trying to get yourself banned, I see.

    I love this place. You can get a wealth of knowledge, a ton of criticism, a thousand pats on the back, grumpy curmudgeon "advice" and still regularly bust out laughing more than occasionally ;)

  10. 2 minutes ago, ThomasPowers said:

    How did you heat treat?

    Very amateurish and unscientifically... I got it red and non magnetic, quenched the cutting edge and the poll alternatingly, left the body hot. Cleaned off enough to see the colors, let the hot body run straw into the cutting edge and then dunked the whole thing. Body wound up bluish, edge and poll were straw-ish.

    This was my first blade of any kind, and my first try at heat treating.

  11. 9 minutes ago, ThomasPowers said:

    Yup y'all have the puny deer out on the east coast...I've run across a herd of elk crossing the road about 2 am where it looked like most could just suck in their gut and my pickup would slide right under them without ruffling a hair...

    Lol, yeah they're like underfed doggies over here, funny looking brown greyhounds... Well, none at all by me now that I'm a city boy, but out on Long Island there are plenty.

  12. Hello all, I'm in the market to upgrade from my HF piece of junkola (barely qualifies as a sander, never mind a grinder... they must use rocking horses to rate the power of their motors) to one of the attachments available for bench grinders and I'm wondering what the various opinions are out there on the advantages/disadvantages of one size as compared to the others.

    I'm assuming the 48" belts have cooler working advantages over the 36" belts, as well as belt life advantages, but is it worth the $100 price difference? As far as the width, I guess that's a matter of personal preference and also partially dictated by the type of work expected to be done.

    I know the easy curmudgeon type answer to my query is "tighten up your panties and build your own 2x72", but that's not really an option for me just yet...

×
×
  • Create New...