I just started forging a few hawks. I ground my own drift it is slightly oval 1 1/4" at widest point which is form front to back sides are slightly narrower with a tapper to the bottom. I did this for two reasons first was the ease of handle replacement second was to prevent the head from spinning. In my opinion it is much easier to slightly thin the sides of a limb to fit the poll than it is to get a good fit with the tear drop poll. I have been thinking more and more about this the last few days and believe that in the user hawks the only benefit of the tear drop is purely cosmetic. You can achieve a much smoother transition from the blade to the poll with the teardrop, but the slightly oval poll is a pretty good comprimise. For hard use where the handle may need to be replaced in the field the only tool you would need to replace the handle would be the hawk head itself held in the hand to hack and slighty thin the sides of a properly sized limb , after which if so choosing a person could use the hastily hafted hawk to make a better replacement. I didnt mean to clutter up this post but this subject has been on my mind alot lately and this post was all I need to make my rant. We are going to put one of my hawk heads thru some torture testing while camping over the next few days and I should be able to post some pics and feed back on how the oval poll has held up.
James