Jump to content
I Forge Iron

jmeineke

Members
  • Posts

    428
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jmeineke


  1. Hi, There still seems to be excessive flashing on the forged strings,

    This may be a combination of the beads being too small, the metal available for the ball being slighly more than required, and being overstruck. (copper is that easy to form, it probably seems quicker to just give it a whack or two, I would anticipate possibly six light blows as it is being rotated after each blow, may improve things)

    What I mean by overstruck, is excessive force used and not enough rotation to form the the ball as a sphere.

    The picture of the item show is more like that of a drop stamped item that is then placed in a second op tool to remove the flash, which will leave a shear line which could make the item appear to be a casting.

    Nearly there, but not quite.

    Yeah, I'm not taking my time on these; I'm hitting very hard and not rotating enough and also just eyeballing where it looks about right. I end up nipping / grinding / filing the flash off and then take the hammer to them.

    The work that's left is going to keep me busy for a while - still have to get them to their final shape, drill them, make the chain and the center and the cross. I've never made a rosary before, let alone my own beads, so we'll see.

    If I attempt this again, I'll definitely be changing my tooling and technique.

    Thanks for all your help.
  2. I've been making some copper beads using mild steel dies (hot rolled) in a guillotine tool and I'm a little surprised at how quick the top die is mushrooming. I'm hitting a lot harder on the one side because I'm drawing out some copper stock (the die has three different functions).

    Should I be using a different material? How do you deal with the mushroom effect? Is there any saving these dies, or do you just use them till they wear out?

    Sorry if this has been covered before, but I've turned up a blank in my searches.

    post-11274-095199400 1286585532_thumb.jp


  3. Yes that looks about right, just break the sharp corners at the centre and other sharp edges

    I haven't gotten around to making the new die set yet, but I thought I'd show you the results of just milling out the exit a bit more like you suggested. Like I said, a lot less waste and less hammering. One of the pics is the finished string after running through the final rounding die and then annealing.

    post-11274-002318600 1286584094_thumb.jp

    post-11274-058695900 1286584117_thumb.jp

    post-11274-094797000 1286584118_thumb.jp

  4. Download the image resizer powertoy from Microsoft. Works with Vista & 7 as well as XP. Just right click the image you want to resize and you'll see an option in the context menu for resizing (after you install the tool, of course).

    http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/powertoys/xppowertoys.mspx

    There are other options too - GIMP, Paint.Net, even MS Paint (installed on every Windows machine) will allow you to resize.

    Hope that helps.

  5. Very nice work there.

    I increased the depth like you suggested and am getting much better results with a lot less waste and less effort (no pics yet, but will post some as soon as I am able).

    Looking at your dies, would you recommend that I mill the entire length (or maybe just a wider section in the middle, twice the length of the ball?). What about a relief hole - would you still recommend one?

    Based on what you're using to make yours, here's what I'm thinking (minus the relief hole - haven't mastered making cutting curves into curved surfaces in sketchup).

    post-11274-098943000 1286213014_thumb.jp


  6. Looking at your picture 2, I would suggest deepening the rear(exit side)to give the 1/16" dimension,

    I would also chamfer all around the edges to allow forging as you rotate the piece, if not you will be left with a lot of splines around the sphere
    ...


    Ok - I'll increase the depth of the exit / chamfer the edges a bit more and try the rotation technique. Looking forward to seeing those pics. Thanks for info!

  7. Glad its working for you, not quite what I had in mind but similar, I would have deepened the spherical holes to reduce the centre spindle length to probably a 1/16", and then I would try rotating the workpiece as you forge, it should also save on material wastage.

    I would not have expected to have to remove the flashing, you should have a spherical section leaving a small diameter at the centre which can just be nipped off and will dress in with the hammer or a light filing, it would not hurt if it actually fell off as you forged the next one.

    Nevertheless Well Done its all a learning curve.

    Wouldn't telepathy be helpful in situations like this, or better still, I should make up what I mean and post a piccie.

    I will see what I can do, I have a larger version of what I am talking about in the workshop or Westpoint I think, if I can lay my hands on it, basically it is very similar in principle and profile to yours, but a simple spring type, with a smaller length waist, it can be used to make balls, or round ended cylinders (catstails/ bull rushes?), or graduated ball tapers.


    I'd love to see what you're talking about. Yeah, I'm wasting quite a bit of copper. I'm making spheres, but not quite getting the concept of how to build the dies. The first set I made failed completely. Basically on that set I drilled a small relief hole and then put the two half spheres in the center (pic 1). It didn't work or I just wasn't working it - not sure. I ended up reusing the dies by just welding up what I drilled out and then ground it flat and started over.

    Pic 2 is what I've got right now, but I'm not rotating the stock at all - just pounding the crud out of it. So you're saying I should just drill the spheres deeper and leave 1/16" in the center?

    post-11274-073464700 1286055306_thumb.jp

    post-11274-032950700 1286055366_thumb.jp

  8. I finally got back around to this project. I built a small guillotine tool and made the dies like John B suggested. It seems to be working pretty well. I'm still getting the technique down, but I've made a half dozen beads.

    I bought a 5/16" ball end mill and tack welded the dies together, drilled a small relief hole and then ball milled half a sphere into each side. I also had to drill out some swages to fuller the rod down to 5/16".

    To do the final shaping, I use another die set with just two half spheres in the center (picture 4). After that, I file off the rough edges and then lightly hammer it in a 1/4 sphere (pic 6) to get the finish I'm looking for.

    post-11274-042870300 1285993586_thumb.jp

    post-11274-039386600 1285993591_thumb.jp

    post-11274-023200400 1285993595_thumb.jp

    post-11274-076414600 1285993598_thumb.jp

    post-11274-071593000 1285993603_thumb.jp

    post-11274-072405800 1285993613_thumb.jp


  9. yah im pretty bummed. I couldnt have gone and picked it up before monday anyway so I didnt have much choice. I think they educated themselves. It went from bing listed as "antique anvil" to "peter wright"

    You should update your profile to include your location. You'll get a lot better advice on what you can expect to pay for an anvil that way. A good buy in New Mexico is not the same as a good buy in Ohio, for example.

    Don't get too bummed out - just keep looking. Give the TPAAAT method a try - it works. Have a look here:

  10. Those look similar to split crosses, you cut the bar in half except for the center, then separate and straighten the arms.

    They look good how you made them. I like the diagonal texture pattern best. (pics 2 and 3)

    I have mixed feeling about the base...it looks like a lot of effort to make it look like hammered finish paint. I hope that is just the picture not doing justice to the effect.

    Phil

    Thanks - I like that pattern too. I made that one for the deacon at my church.

    Here's a closer look at the base.

    post-11274-056973500 1285891619_thumb.jp

  11. Been working on some crosses lately, experimenting with different finishes / textures. I know these don't qualify as traditional forge / anvil / hammer only projects, but they were fun to make. I've been giving them away as gifts.

    The cross arms are mig welded and blended and the bases are spot welded to give a rocky / rough looking texture. I'm using a traditional beeswax / linseed oil coating and then very lightly go over the bars with a 120 grit flap disk to bring out the highlights.

    I think I'm going to try copper plating one sometime down the road. I tried tempering them to get some colors but haven't had much luck with getting a nice looking color pattern.

    The last 2 pics are the same piece just at a different angle.

    post-11274-072830700 1285809323_thumb.jp

    post-11274-000400100 1285809325_thumb.jp

    post-11274-010773900 1285809327_thumb.jp

    post-11274-018968000 1285809328_thumb.jp


  12. I just don't get Google Sketchup. That may be because I actually learned on raytracers like Silver and 3DS Max... more engineering oriented. Circle, radius 3.45. Select Circle. Extrude 5.4. Etc.

    The first time I tried it I didn't get it either. I had to watch the videos and draw something that I wanted to build before started to understand it. The support Q&A forums for it are really good too. My biggest issue right from the start was I couldn't properly dimension objects I was drawing - dragging doesn't cut it when you need precise dimensions. Once I learned how to do that the next big thing was understanding how to get on the right axis, move things, line them up, join them, etc. It's pretty cool once you get the hang of it.

  13. My other addiction is cast iron cookware. Believe me that there are many sellers who think cast iron is steel and not very breakable. It is very disapointing when an irreplaceable piece of history is lost because of ignorance-especially after proper packaging techniques have been suggested.

    I'm a fan of cast iron cookware too. Keep them properly seasoned and they are as good as teflon IMO. I've only done a few repairs to cast and it's all been with MIG which was an interesting experience to say the least - occasionally it would go "critical" on me and there would be like a burst of sparks that would come off for lack of a better explanation. I wish I had known about nickel and brass back then. Live and learn.
  14. I have a lincoln buzz box and love it. Started out with the AC only version and later upgraded to a AD/DC model. I pretty much leave it on DC all the time, but the AC only machines are good too. You probably know this already, but if you want to run 7018 you should look for 7018-AC. I also have a Craftsman 110v MIG with gas that I use a lot too - It's a good quality machine that you can get parts for and has a good reputation.

    As for the Harbor Freight (HF) models, I'd have to agree - save your money and buy a 110v Lincoln or Craftsman (a bit harder to find) if you want something that will last and can be repaired. The HF models do work (my dad owns one and I've used it), but it seems that with just about any HF tool there's a gamble factor involved. You may get one that lasts the rest of your life, but you may also get one that goes 'poof' after a few spools like Sam said.

×
×
  • Create New...