Jump to content
I Forge Iron

Frosty got me thinking about Limestone


eseemann

Recommended Posts

Good Morning All, 

I hope all is safe and healthy for you and yours. 

Frosty made a comment in a post about Castable Refractory that sent me down this rabbit hole. Here are some notes and links that you folks might like.

Mizzou has been in use in propane forges since I don't know when and lives up to it's rep and then some. It just has about the same insulating properties as the same thickness of limestone. One foot thickness = R1. Th 

The R-Value is an imperial system unit of measurement (ft^2·°F·h/BTU) 

Mizzou Castable Refractory 7.4 btu-in/hr-F-ft^2 at 2000 at degrees 

Limestone 8.74 btu-in/hr-F-ft^2

Kast-O-lite 26 LI Insulating Castable Refractory: 4.0 btu-in/hr-F-ft^2 at 2000 degrees

Kast-O-lite 30 LI Insulating Castable Refractory:4.54 btu-in/hr-F-ft^2 at 2000 degrees

IFB 23 2 Btu-in/ft², hr, °F at 2000 degrees

Kaowool 2.98 BTU-in/hr-ft²-°F at 1800 degrees

https://thermtest.com/materials-database

http://www.matweb.com/Search/MaterialGroupSearch.aspx?GroupID=11

http://www.matweb.com/search/datasheet_print.aspx?matguid=cb830e74bc69422aa560a7b57494955a

https://converter.eu/thermal_conductivity/#1.26_Watt/Meter-K_in_BTU/Hour-Foot-°F

https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/thermal-conductance-conversion-d_1334.html

https://www.bnzmaterials.com/miscellaneous-materials/castables/

https://www.bnzmaterials.com/insulating-firebrick/ifb-3200/

https://www.naturalstoneinstitute.org/stoneprofessionals/technical-bulletins/rvalue/

k-Value (Thermal Conductivity) (W/mK)

R-Value Equivalent (R)3 (Hr • ft2 • ºF / Btu)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You ask a very valid question that I can only answer with a slack jawed look. 
I got no idea but I do know (look at me thinking I know something, I should say I kinda think) that any addition or subtraction of something from another thing will change the properties of the combined whole.  Sort of like what I learned from from the periodic videos channel on  Youtube. If you try and mold plutonium in a press the plutonium flakes off. But if you alloy plutonium with 2% (or so) of gallium you don't have that problem. 2%, that is almost nothing except if you think about what 1.8% carbon vs 2.8 carbon does to iron, one makes a blade and the other makes a frying pan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an almost reflex of mine to go for the LOOK when talking to folks and it hasn't always worked out well for me. In truth though just skimming the list of cites did indeed give me a headache. Nothing major, I joked it off but my mind no longer embraces keeping multiple things organized at once. 

I concede I was misusing terms and that's a button of mine. R value doesn't apply to a furnace's insulation value. I'll have to find another or figure out how to make it clear the comparison is a rule of thumb example not literal. 

You're absolutely right the smallest change can make huge differences and chemistry is nothing but a near infinite number of combinations and possibilities. 

As I recall we were talking about claying a forge, JABOD I think which isn't really a refractory issue. Thankfully Thomas brought us up short on using lime in a high temp environment. 

Frosty The Lucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually there is a really neat mixture you can use for parging a firepot's surface; lets see now it was a mixture of charcoal, sulfur and potassium nitrate.  Mix wet and apply and when you fire up the forge next time you will find that it did a bang up job!

Of course I have been know to take the coating for sparklers and mix it in another smith's coal supply at demos---it can be most amusing though I haven't done it very often now that my running away is slowing down!

Part of the job here is to tell folks what we may have learned the hard way so they don't have to!  A lot of us here tried a bunch of weird stuff when we were young and figured out that perhaps somethings were not a good idea. I sometimes feel very lucky that I'm still counting in decimal!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of the old days, it was funny to  have +++ in a password, because typing the  triple + reset the modem,  which disconnected their computer lol, the only way to enterthat 3+ section was to type 2+ then back space then add 2 more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hayes compatible modems & ATDT; I was lucky enough to avoid the 300 baud acoustically coupled modems; but it was several years before I got a modem with a transfer rate that could write to my monochrome---orange!---monitor faster than I could read it.  I was just talking with a Professor here and he was asking if I had missed out on punch card computing.  I told him that I had found punch cards a great leap forward as I started programming using a teletype and punched paper tape and it was only when I went to Cornell that I got to use a keypunch and cards! Of course the system I used in HS---an old PDP system, was donated because it was obsolete; but I still got time in on it!   My high school was right by two Bell Labs locations and so we had a computer when none of the other schools did!

Napier's Bones & the good old days!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...