MattBower Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 An excellent demonstration by a couple Internet buddies of mine:http://paleoplanet69529.yuku.com/topic/47099/Normalization-Grain-Size-Control-Experiment-----normalize Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WmHorus Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 Its a really cool step by step showing the stages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigfootnampa Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 That's a very nice demo! Good photos too! I have to confess that I rarely normalize anything... but I am careful not to overheat and I do work my metal fast and hard while it is hot. I also try to minimize heating areas that are not being worked. In future I will be more alert though and normalize whenever I am not real confident of my ongoing grain control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasPowers Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 Of course this is alloy dependent; as I recall when I looked up heat treat of S1 in the ASM handbook normalization was not suggested! Though for most plain carbon steels it is a very good idea indeed! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattBower Posted October 7, 2011 Author Share Posted October 7, 2011 Some steels are so high in alloys that it's difficult to grow the grain. That's true. (S1 has quite a bit of chromium and a bunch of tungsten, for example, both of which inhibit grain growth.) But in line with what you're saying, Thomas, those tend to be steels that most of us lack the capacity to HT properly, anyway. (E.g., the recommended hardening procedure for S1 is, "Heat slowly. Preheat at 650 C (1200 F). Austenitize at 900 to 955 C (1650 to 1750 F), hold for 15 to 45 min, then quench in oil.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattBower Posted October 7, 2011 Author Share Posted October 7, 2011 That's a very nice demo! Good photos too! Yeah, Ken's a very good photographer, Makes me feel slightly ashamed of the terrible pics I take. :angry: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Hale Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 Matt thanks so much for posting this. It is a procedure I have shown to several folks in my shop for along time. And In fact the pics are so much easier for folks to view rather than trying to see in their mind. I wrote the procedure up in almost every step not long ago in this chat room for a newcomer to try in his shop. I did take it one step farther if anyone would like to give it a go: I over heated the steel another time and then normalized three times before breaking. It may surprise you with the results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pkrankow Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 Thank you for posting. Let the authors know our appreciation please. This is a wonderful reference. Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teenylittlemetalguy Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 Sure brought the message home for me, thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woody Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 Interesting demonstration but slightly less than scientific. Were the pieces heated to exactly the same temperature and were they held at temperature for exactly the same time. Every published document that I have been able to find says that normalizing is a function of time at temperature. That is the metal is heated to the correct temperature for the alloy, and the temperature varies considerable from one alloy to the next, and then the steel is soaked at that temperature for a given period of time. Then the steel is allowed to air cool. On page 69 of Metallurgy of Steel for Bladesmiths & Others who Heat Treat and Forge Steel John D. Verhoeven Emeritus Professor Iowa State University it shows how heating the steel to 1450 degrees F holding for 4 minutes and then quenched in rapidly stired oil 3 times reduced grain size in 1045, 1086 and 5150 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thingmaker3 Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 Not a bad article at all. Too bad about the hot bit of debris stuck in his eye, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangerdave Posted October 13, 2011 Share Posted October 13, 2011 Wow I actually just screwed up normalizing a couple of files. I am going to do a do over prior to screwing them up anymore. Do overs work right? Thanks for posting. RD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don A Posted October 13, 2011 Share Posted October 13, 2011 I'd say it was very scientific. They were clear that they were using a single steel and varied heats to observe the result. It demonstrated their intention very well. If I wanted to know the same about 1045 or 5160 I would repeat the same experiment on each of them. Who knows... you might find something different. I'm grateful to folks that will go to that much trouble and then freely share their findings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.