Solar Powered forge?
#21
Posted 20 February 2008 - 11:00 AM
Good Luck!
#22
Posted 01 March 2008 - 10:36 AM
Woodware Designs -- The Solar Forge
however..
Quote
The most likely use of a Solar Forge is as heat source for small businesses. The following table shows the temperatures that are needed to work some common recyclable materials into new products:
Material..................F...................C
Steel, work.............800-1000........430-540
Steel, anneal..........1350-1500.......730-820
Steel, melt.............2500-2700.......1350-1460
Aluminum, melt.......1218................660
Brass, melt............1652-1724........900-940
Bronze, melt..........1562-1832.......850-1000
Copper, melt..........1981...............1083
Lead, melt.............621.................327
Zinc, melt..............786.................419
Silver, melt............1762................961
Gold, melt.............1946................1063
Glass, work...........1200-1800.........650-980
Glass, melt............2000-2400........1100-1320
From this table we can see that the Solar Forge is just a toy unless it can raise a bar of steel with a cross-section larger than your thumb to a good hammering cherry red (800 F, 430 C) in 20 minutes. Furthermore, to be of commercial value, it must be able melt a crucible with 2.2 pounds (1 kilogram) of aluminum (1218 F, 659 C) in one hour. These will make good test criteria for Solar Forge prototypes.
No Solar Forge prototype has yet passed these tests.
The design seems to be detailed and viable (tracking, parabola construction, size, contact assistance), if it was primarily employed as a boost heat source to a propane forge I think there would be considerable cost savings. His viability standard for steelwork seems reasonable, and the failure of his prototypes indicative of exactly how large an array one would need to build to make a forge solely powered by sunlight.
one turns to the other and asks
"Does this taste funny to you?"
#23
Posted 01 March 2008 - 11:10 AM
Telescope builders have earth synchronous timers and gear units to track the sun.
"He was the kind of a guy that could screw up an anvil with a tack hammer"
#24
Posted 03 March 2008 - 01:34 AM
I think that when I was beginning, one of my problems was not getting the metal hot enough. But this is ridiculous. First, 800F is not "cherry red". I cannot see 800F reliably, not even at night. And I have a pyrometer. Second, "cherry red" is not "good hammering". "Good hammering" is light orange or yellow (2000F +). Again, these are my preferences, and some smiths may prefer cooler, but not that cold.
#25
Posted 07 May 2009 - 12:07 PM
RainsFire said:
where are you in Oregon I'm moving there this summer
#26
Posted 27 July 2009 - 10:43 AM
There is an experimental solar furnace built in Switzerland that achieves 2000F. It looks like a glass walled office building built into a hillside to get enough collection area.
palumbo solar furnace - Google Search
A lot of articles to wade through, most requiring membership. Sorry, I don't have membership either. You might need to brush up on your calculus to understand some of this though. I know there is a formula for calculating the area of collector needed to bring a chamber to a given temperature for a given solar incidence in these articles. Your solar incidence is either measured or reported as a seasonal average for your area, but will vary from day to day.
Since I haven't used this level of math in years, I would need to brush up to understand it too.
Phil
#27
Posted 27 July 2009 - 12:13 PM
And 20 minutes is a long heat!
#28
Posted 13 August 2009 - 09:56 AM
Blessed are the cracked for they let in the light
#29
Posted 13 August 2009 - 03:31 PM
well, the electric blower runs on batteries that are charged by photovoltaic panels :D
does that count?
#30
Posted 23 December 2009 - 07:49 PM
jayco said:
My uncle told of using a magnifying glass to light cigarettes when he was out of matches..
I guess if you could multiply the effect by 100, or 1000 times, you might be on to something.
I suspect there might be some kind of physical limits on how mush heat can actually be generated this way.....but I'm no scientist and occasionally I am wrong( well......more than just occasionally).
If the idea really works, it could supply a lot of the world's energy needs.
Who knows.
Truthfully speaking, a frsnel lense is no joking matter. A good large one (4' x 4' or 3' x 5') can reach temperatures up to an in excess of 5000 degrees F.
These lenses do not just provide a tiny pinprick of light either. You are talking a quarter inch to quarter size spot of that temp. You can quite easily smelt brass with one.
Theyt are just expensive as all get out, and you have to keep them clean and relatively unscratched. (They are not made of glass, but if I remember correctly are a polycarbonate plastic.)
For forge work though... I doubt it. Not enough watts to provide enough heat over a big enough area.
A bladesmith could use a fresnel lense on a frame to smelt his bolsters etc.. though.
#31
Posted 04 April 2010 - 10:54 AM
#32
Posted 05 April 2010 - 12:09 PM
#33
Posted 24 September 2010 - 08:03 AM
Sadly Forge tempratures are achiveable but not currently economicly viable. Better off the grid solutions are available! Without your neighbours bitching about your "solar array"
Fools wander and wise men travel.
#34
Posted 26 September 2010 - 09:22 PM
jason0012, on 04 April 2010 - 10:54 AM, said:
This talk of lenses vs. parabolic mirrors is neglecting designs already proven from the 19th century. The favored design for solar steam engines back then turned out to be a trackable mirror in the form of a cone with the tip missing. It had a linear (not point) focus which they used to heat a tubular boiler. Their boilers would get to red heat _viewed in bright sunshine_ and would melt down if the water feed failed, so they're surely hot enough for a forge.
This design has several advantages for a forge. The work goes in through a small hole in the peak of the cone, along its axis. Which means the smithy is always in the shade, a major advantage in the kind of sunny climate you need to make one of these things useful. The heat is even, from all sides of the workpiece.
One small and one large drawback: the small one is that your iron will oxidize like crazy, unless you come up with some kind of gas shield for it. (Usually, our forges have an automatic gas shield of carbon monoxide, methane or propane due to a slight excess of fuel over air in the working zone.) Putting some charcoal in a holder alongside the work, with holes or nozzles to direct the CO vapor, should help, but I haven't actually worked this one out in practice.
The bigger problem is wind. Most of the 19th Century examples worked very well, until they were wrecked by high winds. Most of the areas (in this country at least) that have lots of sunshine have at least occasional violent winds, though the occasional sheltered valley or basin might be found. Some of the subtropical desert areas of the world are not so windy, and might be a good place to try this.
As always with alternative energy, location is everything. The installation that works to perfection on one site can be a heartbreaking waste of time and money the next state, or sometimes the next mile, over!
Conrad Hodson
#35
Posted 26 September 2010 - 09:56 PM
fat pete, on 06 January 2008 - 08:40 PM, said:
Hey! I got those, solar powered lights! Called windows!
but then there are others who, with the help of their art and their intelligence,
transform a yellow spot into the sun.” ~ Pablo Picasso ~
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















