It's finally here.
#1
Posted 25 February 2010 - 08:39 PM
#2
Posted 25 February 2010 - 08:55 PM
After a while,do chamfer the edges,though,they're awfully fragile.Will hurt your work,too,but mainly for the sake of the anvil itself.
Amazing tool,can only imagine using something like that.100# is the biggest anvil i've spent time working on,and only the last couple of years,mostly used a 50# before.
Very happy for you!
Ghandi:"I think it would be a very good idea".
.............................................
Kaspar Hauser Lives!
#3
Posted 25 February 2010 - 09:25 PM
#4
Posted 25 February 2010 - 09:28 PM
Use the anvil first before your change anything. Make a radius plate to fit into the hardie hole and use it for those occasions you may need a radius. You can change a radius plate a lot easier than buying another anvil. And IF you want to grind on that new anvil, you will have a pattern to go by from where you used the radius plate. Just look for the wear pattern.
The edges of the anvil will naturally form a radius on the edges of the face from use and wear. May take 20, 30, 40 or more years, but hey, what is a little bit of time when your having fun. (grin).
#5
Posted 25 February 2010 - 09:58 PM
I hope the attached pic can illustrate this to a degree. The edge closest to the horn is sharp, as is the lengthwise edge nearest the pritchel but the edge in that same plane next to the horn has a large radius (probably 1/2"R or a bit more); the opposite edge of the anvil has an even larger radius, closer to 1"R. I can tilt a part at a 45 deg angle over these edges and fuller very quickly then drop the piece onto the anvil face and smooth out those impressions. Using a hammer with a heavy edge radius doubles this action and makes drawing a breeze. This is a 246 lb Peter Wright - you might also note the concrete base, which weighs 275 lbs, making the whole assembly a very sturdy forging platform. I have had several professional smiths use this setup during workshops or demonstrations and all of them commented favorably about the solid foundation and amount of rebound.
BTW, the stain on top was some grease that I neglected to remove before taking the photo.
Attached Files
#6
Posted 25 February 2010 - 10:04 PM
Here's some direction on radius edges
http://www.anvilfire...Anvils%20Radius
I agree with Glenn, once the stock is removed it's gone!
Phil
#7
Posted 25 February 2010 - 11:56 PM
#8
Posted 26 February 2010 - 02:30 AM
I'll echo Glenn's sentiment in that I would leave it alone and just use it. IF, after using it you feel you want to radius the edges then go for it... but like was mentioned, once it's gone it's gone.
You can't unscramble an egg.
I like sharp edges on my anvil, but I'm forging blades and it is just MY personal preference. I have several different blocks that slip into the hardie hole if I want a different shape.
(and I take pretty good care of mine too)
#9
Posted 26 February 2010 - 03:37 AM
Metal,hard as the face is,is extremely brittle where it meets the corner.A medium-strengh blow with a 1-lb hammer is guaranteed to chip it.One does have an accidental blow fall,every once in a while,and the edges do spall,and have to be ground out later anyway,but in a random pattern.
I also disagree with the chamfer increasing toward the hardy and the tail.Next to the horn is where the hardest work is done,and the radius should be largest there,3/8" or so.Toward the unsupported counter it can decrease to almost sharp,to true-up some inside corners,perhaps,but that work is done gently.
Anyone that has ever pounded a stake onto the ground would understand all the mechanics involved.And no one is safe from an occasional wild blow,so...
As to the gentleman bladesmithing on an undressed anvil,well,i suppose that you do light work,and that you do it gingerly,not much mass in a blade...Technically,the proportion is(supposed to be)1/10.mass of sledge/mass of anvil.I've exceeded that on occasion,had to.And a heavy sledge blow anywhere close to the edge will spall it,for sure,physics,you see...(Temperatures matter,as well).
Sorry,but i do hold these views categorically.
Ghandi:"I think it would be a very good idea".
.............................................
Kaspar Hauser Lives!
#10
Posted 26 February 2010 - 08:13 AM
I knocked mine back a little at a time over a period of a year or more. I would file and sand a bit whenever the notion struck.
I like it where it's at now.
Bear in mind that most of the new cast steel anvils will initially be softer in the face than most of the old war-horses.
I also incorporate the radius into my forging. I can set a half-blow shoulder with a radius of around 3/8 down to nearly sharp simply by changing the position of the work along the edge.
Don
#11
Posted 26 February 2010 - 08:44 AM
Personally, I would take a flap wheel down each side at 45 degrees for a quick pass. Then looking back on what I have learned that I like I may do more. If you haven't a clue what you like, then stop.
I came to this opinion as I have a Hay Budden with no sharp corner whatsoever anywhere. When I need a sharp edge Well I make one to drop in the hardy hole. Kinda like Glenn said only different.
I would like to have an edge that had a radius about like Hollis. I don't and won't till I can buy a new anvil. Then I'll probably knock it back to prevent chipping and see what develops. If you find yourself doing a permanent change to a valuable tool because you think you ought to, because somebody said to, without being sure that that is what you need to do, then you'll likely regret it. Adapting your tools to do the job you need to do is a big attraction to this craft. Do it with forethought and judiciousness.
#12
Posted 26 February 2010 - 09:22 AM
K. Bryan Morgan, on 25 February 2010 - 11:56 PM, said:
I would radius. I am not sure if I would be light about it, or follow that set of directions...I just don't have enough experience yet.
I DO know what working on blown out edges is like, as my first anvil had only badly broken and blown out edges. The anvil I just picked up has damaged and good edges, and I am not sure if I want to try re-dressing them, or what yet. I don't think I need to have it welded at least.
Phil
#13
Posted 26 February 2010 - 09:38 AM
#14
Posted 26 February 2010 - 11:23 AM
#15
Posted 26 February 2010 - 11:45 AM
jake pogrebinsky, on 26 February 2010 - 03:37 AM, said:
Its all about putting the FUN back in dysfunctional.
Captain Psychobabble
#16
Posted 26 February 2010 - 01:23 PM
#17
Posted 26 February 2010 - 03:03 PM
I think that Don A has a good aproach as well. Take your time and get it right. That is a philosophy that has served me well over the years.
I would also like to thank Brian Brazeal for the information about the hardy hole. I hadn't even thought about that. If my hardy tool has a radiused edge and I put it in the hardy it could spall out because it isnt sharp like the hole edge is. And you will get a better fit. I also imagine that most will have a filit that is either ground down, or not. In either case you have a tool that is rocking in the hole, not good, or you are damaging the hole, also not good.
So I will be knocking off edges as time allowes and will take my time and do it right. I have some very good Nicholson files. I can do some draw filing on it and get some of those real sharp edges, and they are very very sharp, down to a 1/8th round. At least to begin with. I will be leaving some edges sharp. But in places I won't be using heavy blows with. Over time I bet I will work it to a good working tool.
How do you go about making the radiuses and how do you make sure your getting it round and not a bunch of flat facets?
#18
Posted 26 February 2010 - 03:24 PM
#19
Posted 26 February 2010 - 07:23 PM
Kinda think it may be a bit too hard to file easily. Light and careful use of a sanding disc in a smaller angle grinder should do the job. Use both handS (one on the side handle) for best control. Stroke and feather the grinder in overlapping runs rather than pressing it on on and pull/pushing it. Maybe start with 60 grit and finish with 180 grit. Most importantly, if your unsure, practice on pieces of angle iron held in a vice. Personnally I wouldn't be too bothered about stoning it to a finish. Bearing mind my rant about it being a working tool it'll soon loose that finish.
Enjoy!
Its all about putting the FUN back in dysfunctional.
Captain Psychobabble
#20
Posted 26 February 2010 - 07:55 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
















