hardwood charcoal question
#1
Posted 13 January 2010 - 02:00 PM
#2
Posted 13 January 2010 - 02:23 PM
go to your profile and enter your location. Because there might be a blacksmith from here right around the corner who can tell you where he gets his coal.
sorry for not answering your question.....I just thought this at least would be helpful
alec
http://alectheblacksmith.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.c...ectheblacksmith My you tube channel.
#3
Posted 13 January 2010 - 02:37 PM
#4
Posted 13 January 2010 - 06:00 PM
#5
Posted 13 January 2010 - 06:22 PM
#6
Posted 13 January 2010 - 06:49 PM
#7
Posted 13 January 2010 - 06:52 PM
#8
Posted 13 January 2010 - 11:16 PM
ron
#9
Posted 14 January 2010 - 09:18 AM
#10
Posted 14 January 2010 - 10:16 AM
son_of_bluegrass, on 13 January 2010 - 11:16 PM, said:
ron
I've noticed Cowboy doesn't throw as many forge fleas as Royal Oak, but nothing beats home-made charcoal.
Also, I've heard Charcoal has the exact same BTU's as coal per POUND. So, yeah, it will take more charcoal.
#11
Posted 14 January 2010 - 11:41 AM
#12
Posted 14 January 2010 - 03:37 PM
#13
Posted 14 January 2010 - 06:24 PM
Mark
#14
Posted 14 January 2010 - 06:54 PM
I picked up two 55 gallon drums last night to store charcoal in----I'm going to do a smelt this year for sure! (previous use edible oil storage---*always* be wary of what *might* have been in a Barrel!)
#15
Posted 31 January 2010 - 12:30 AM
To the OP I also used a bag of cowboy just to see how it compared to my home made and there was no difference to me.
#16
Posted 01 February 2010 - 12:40 PM
*Not* a forging charcoal; but great for grilling.
#17
Posted 05 February 2010 - 11:05 AM
Cowboy brand is fine to use. It's not the best, because it's made from scrap lumber and so the sizing can be irregular and sometimes you'll get unburned pieces.
As someone else already posted, look around your area, if you've a restaurant supply store, that's going to be the best place to buy.
One thing a lot of folks forget about charcoal, is it was the fuel of choice for thousands of years. It wasn't until the forests were disappearing that coal was commonly used.
It's still the fuel of choice for Japanese sword smiths and some American smiths prefer it when doing fine work. Tom Latane is one that comes to mind.
Now, if you're going to use charcoal, you might want to consider getting rid of your bottom blast fire box. Since charcoal doesn't need to be "coked" the box isn't needed, using it will result in you using far more charcoal then you need. A simple grate in the middle of a steel plate will work very well. You just let the ash build up a bit and you'll have a fine forge. Clinker is also less of a problem, so no need for a clinker breaker.
This is what Dale Morse of Clayhill Forge has at his school in Waynesboro, Virginia. Alas, I have no photos.
This is my brand of whiskey, drink what you find taste best to you.
www.wayfarerforge.com
#18
Posted 05 February 2010 - 12:01 PM
Gerald Boggs, on 05 February 2010 - 11:05 AM, said:
Now, if you're going to use charcoal, you might want to consider getting rid of your bottom blast fire box. Since charcoal doesn't need to be "coked" the box isn't needed, using it will result in you using far more charcoal then you need. A simple grate in the middle of a steel plate will work very well. You just let the ash build up a bit and you'll have a fine forge. Clinker is also less of a problem, so no need for a clinker breaker.
This is what Dale Morse of Clayhill Forge has at his school in Waynesboro, Virginia. Alas, I have no photos.
This is my brand of whiskey, drink what you find taste best to you.
Doesn't the fire need to be deeper than a coal fire? I have found that forge welding is much more difficult in a shallow charcoal fire. It seems to require another couple of inches of depth to weld the same way with charcoal. Maybe it's just my technique, but the coal seems to work fine in the standard depth firepots. Making a forge without a firepot seems like going backwards. Sometimes I prop a couple of firebricks up when I am using charcoal. This seems to make sense given the density differences of the two fuels.
#19
Posted 05 February 2010 - 02:46 PM
When using any fire, the depth can be very shallow. I have regularly forge welded in a fire with less then two inches of depth. In fact, years ago, when I was struggling to learn to weld. I went to Dale Morse for help. As I wrote before, he uses a forge without a box. Of the bottom blast forges I've used, I like his the best.
If you're having problems, I think it might be because of change. I find anytime I change from the side-blast I use in my shop to a bottom blast, it takes a little while for me to get a feel for it. I find the same if I switch from coal to coke to charcoal. Each fuel is a little different and has it's own flavor of use. I find with charcoal or coke, I can have a far smaller fire then with coal.
Quote
I think they came into common usage, not because "blacksmiths" were using them, but because "Farriers" were. The side-blast and bottom blast without a box, both need to develop the bed. If you're a farrier, you often need to transport your forge. The dirt and ash, makes that hard, both in terms of weight and heat. With the bottom blast box, you just dump out the coals and you're ready to transport. That and the fact, Montgomery Wards and Sears made it so cheap to buy theirs, that everyone did. After a while, folks just forgot there was anything else but a bottom blast fire box forge.
www.wayfarerforge.com
#20
Posted 08 March 2010 - 04:29 PM
JohnW
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














