Blacksmith and Metalworking Forum
This is a discussion on IForgeIron Wiki within the Keeping You Informed forums, part of the I Forge Iron Forum category; IForgeIron has added a wiki . The members of IForgeIron are welcome to post, add, change, and edit the wiki ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| IForgeIron has added a wiki. The members of IForgeIron are welcome to post, add, change, and edit the wiki to make it the best blacksmithing resource possible. Go to the IForgeIron wiki
__________________ Tools do not make the blacksmith, the blacksmith makes the tools. gc If someone questions your standards, they are not high enough. |
| |||
| I like the idea of members being able to add to the Wiki or edit or correct others mistakes on it.
__________________ "Enter the Dragon's Lair, bring forth his rage, forge it into shape." FAF Motto Five Alarm Forge -Headsmith |
| |||
| Not having an education with computers and such, I am left with a question about how this concept works. Doe’s someone write (post) an opinion or provide information about a topic, then leave it open for anyone with an opposing opinion or concepts to re-write over it? There are a lot of ways to skin a cat. Not that one way is always best. How about a little more simple and complete information about how this works for un-informed people like me. I would hate to see someone over-write a factually correct article with their un-informed opinion. I am sure I don’t understand the concept, so please help me to understand it correctly! Be safe! Old Rusty Ted
__________________ Be safe |
| |||
| Thank You for the rapid responce Glenn. The explaination you gave is understandable. It will head me in the right direction to get a better understand as the concept is put into action and the effective use of the concept unravels. The older I get, the harder I find it is for me to accept change and new concepts. Thats just me. Glenn Thank you again for helping us to come into the new age of technology. Be safe! Old Rusty Ted
__________________ Be safe |
| |||
| I expanded "forge" in a couple of areas so it looks more like a dictionary entry. Don't think you have to do this on every definition and feel free to edit my changes if they need it (I minored in English and write lots of reports at work so it comes naturally for me). Just try to make certain that your information is not 'hearsay' and can be factually substantiated. |
| |||
| Concerning the issue of Wiki, I feel it is time for me to eat crow along with a large plate of humble pie for desert. By not comprehending what the concept of Wiki was, it alarmed me. I incorrectly thought it gave other people the resource and the ability to access and correct our normal on-line posts for spelling, punctuation, and over-write with their opinions after we had entered them. I knew everyone may post their own opinions about anyone’s opinion with their own post, and thought that was already sufficient. I was wrong in my thinking about what Wiki was. After Glenn gave a more detailed explanation of what Wiki was, I understood it better. Now that I have checked out the existing Wiwi examples, I do stand corrected. In fact, I hope my questioning of what the program was about, did not deter anyone from giving it a try. Now, I am very impressed and excited about Wiki being added to I Forge Iron. Wiki Rocks! Glenn, thank you for your explanation that helped me understand what a practical and useful tool Wiki is for us who use I Forge Iron. Be safe! Old Rusty Ted
__________________ Be safe |
| ||||
| Ted, I am glad I was able to clear up the confusion of the true purpose of the Wiki, that of a dictionary / encyclopedia that every one can contribute to and improve. It takes a big man to stand up and say he was wwww, wwwr, wwwroooo, mistaken. (grin). As to the crow and humble pie, may I suggest you make posts to the Wiki and improve the resource instead.
__________________ Tools do not make the blacksmith, the blacksmith makes the tools. gc If someone questions your standards, they are not high enough. |
| |||
| One suggestion, and this is how other larger wiki's tend to operate. Only post a record in a definitive narative if the topic is widely agreed upon. If various parties have a different way, material, or believe something came to be from different historical contexts make sure to note that as you add information. Otherwise you can start some nasty arguments among various schools of practice. One instance would be what the best material that Widget A can be made out of. Instead of writing what one thinks is the best material, one could write. Widget A is made out of Material B by various blacksmiths as it's strength and resistance to (yada yada) are believed to be ideal for Widget A's usage. If multiple views are out there, enter them in weighted by the percentage of those that share that point, without referring to the lesser as 'wrong' in any way. Regardless of your own personal opinion. -MJ |