Blacksmith and Metalworking Forum
This is a discussion on Anvil repair within the Blacksmithin' forums, part of the Blacksmithing category; Philip, can you not track down the "real" chinese anvils???? im just not having it that a country with a ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| |||
|
Philip, can you not track down the "real" chinese anvils???? im just not having it that a country with a population of 1bn folks do not have a functional, cheap steel anvil sold in the tens of thousands of units per month for 'domestic' use. (not the C.I cr&p sold to the gullable west coz its perceived cheap) The bulk of early industrial development starts with the blacksmith in one form or another, and the chinese are not all using cast iron wear out in 3 month tools. find the real anvils phil!!!!!! |
| |||
|
John, the history of Chinese metallurgy is significantly different from that of the West. Basically they came at iron opposite to how we did; by and large we had wrought iron until about AD1500 when cast iron gradually found uses (and ways of making it). In China they seem to have made cast iron exclusively until a similar point in history. (They did fine small amounts of iron for certain limited applications, but it weren't cheap.) I suspect that there is not so much of a tradition of forging iron over there as here. I also suspect that wrought iron objects were often traded in once it became available, but I don't really know much about this area of technology, time and space. (And before the nitpickers start ( ;-) ) yes, cast iron was around in Europe before the mid 2nd millenium. It was though by-and-large considered a waste product of iron-smelting resulting from too high a concentration of charcoal to ore, too high a smelting temperature or both. There is also an exception to the exception in that it is possible [Japanese swordsmiths do something similar to this, and we think we have evidence of the Romans doing it] that cast iron was semi-deliberately created in order that blooms formed adjacent to cast iron had higher carbon contents, what was often called steely iron. The Romans even had a word, ferrum noricum which probably refers to steel make in Norica in this way; the naming strategy is a little like that of Damascus steel. The videos I have seen of Chinese people forging blades etc. for export usually show what we might refer to as an expediant or improvised anvil, though it is as valid as yours, mine or Sam Yellin's. Large sledgehammer heads, chunks of this-n-that etc. I wouldn't be surprised if this is in fact the traditional Chinese anvil if you see what I mean. After all, the London-pattern anvil is quintessentially a British and American thing, and is younger in centuries than ironworking is in millenia. Last edited by matt87; 03-31-2008 at 09:25 PM. |
| |||
|
The ancient chinese even worked out a way to decarburize the surface of cast iron objects leaving a steel layer over the cast iron core---might have been used for anvils though I know it was used for plows and some weapons. Later and in India I have seen an example of decarburizing a cast iron grill to make it stronger.
__________________ Thomas |
| ||||
| Thomas this needs to be said, i think you did a brilliant job on that fork, and in no way intended to down talk it. my comments are solely based on the typical supply of forks most smiths will encounter, and how they can get similar results with forks inferior to yours. i hope that buries the hatchet on that one. a hardie hole could be cut with a water jet to the correct taper, but using a laser cutter on that area of the fork will disrupt the temper and make it susceptible to bending. this holds true for cutting the horn as well, but disrupting the temper here will allow you to shape the horn more easily and make it bend from abuse rather than snap. the heel needs to be as strong as possible especially since a scrapped fork will be worn thin in this area. D
__________________ in loving memory of LeCynthia Best, 1979-2007. you are not forgotten. |
| |||
|
Hey I'm not in a snit---I didn't do anything to that fork; Marco and Krieger asked me about an improvised anvil and I told them where it was and they did all the work. I still have mine and plan to make it into a medieval double horned stake anvil after I get power to the shop. I already have a Y1K cube of steel for an early anvil. Those forks weigh about 180# apiece as the crow drags them off the side of a bluff and through the woods to where some fool will load them into their pickup (I did the dragging and loading of mine myself), and is thicker than all the heels of my anvils save the 500# Fisher. I don't think there will be a problem with it getting beaten down if you put a hardy hole in it. I'm assuming that you would truncate the piece sticking out sideways back before the taper starts as having that much haning out would increase the bounce vibration and *noise*! Mounting them vertically so you get more mass right under the hammer is the way to go in my opinion, though a piece to flatten on would be handy too. My comment is that the cutting step is not needed on such an anvil and ---as mentioned even not a good idea. So No Harm No Foul and there is more than one way to skin a cat; or as Kipling wrote "There are nine and ninety ways of composing tribal lays and everylast one of them is *right*!"
__________________ Thomas |
| ||||
|
ok tom, not sure if we are entirely clear on terminology, when referring to the "heel" of a fork this area is the part that is in contact with the ground when the mast is fully collapsed and tilted slightly back towards the truck. a properly adjusted chain will hold the fork approximately 1/2" above the ground with the mast at rest and perfectly vertical; however as the chains wear and stretch, the forks tend to lower to the ground and drag along the floor, which wears the heel down. this is the most common reason for scrapping a fork as wear beyond 10% in this area begins to have a severe effect on its carrying capacity. if one wishes to cut a hardie hole this would be the place to do it, but as the rest of the work surface cantilevers beyond this point, it is potentially a weak area and cold cutting the hole with a water jet will create the strongest work surface. you are absolutely correct about ring; even a class IV fork like the one you have, if inverted, would IMO only have a practical maximum work surface of about a linear foot, with maybe another six inches for a horn, beyond that it will create a LOT of noise. im sure there are some who would scoff at the methods i am describing, choosing instead to pick up a torch, but i am confident that for those with access to the proper equipment the extra effort will result in a better anvil. Forks are made from heat treated 5160 steel and are VERY tough, using a water jet will give you full advantage of this strength. cheers
__________________ in loving memory of LeCynthia Best, 1979-2007. you are not forgotten. |
| |||
|
disregarding the history of chinese metallurgy, I still maintain there are a billion people there, and a decent percentage of them must be metalworkers. Cast steel makes a nice anvil, and there are many hundreds of thousands of tons of steel poured in china every year (or month, I have no idea of the actual total foundary output, but its vast). They must make a 'block' that is suitable and efficent to forge against with a hand hammer, in bulk, and very cheaply. On fork tine anvils, the second you haul that to a waterjet cutters, pay the minimum setup fee for the cut (if they will do it, which most wont), haul it back and fabricate it into a working tool you could have bought a very nice 'commercial' traditional style anvil, and had some change. might be good for a novelty item, but commercially not viable for 99.9% of people, IMHO |