Blacksmith and Metalworking Forum
This is a discussion on TIG question on Al within the Welding/Fab General Discussion forums, part of the Welding / Fabrication category; I didn't want to hijack the other thread so will pose this question here to the local TIG gurus. I ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| |||
|
I didn't want to hijack the other thread so will pose this question here to the local TIG gurus. I have used my TIG on stainless, titanium and mild steel with great success but never welded aluminum. Last week at work, we found an aluminum casting on one of the production lathes that was broken so they asked me to fix it. This is a hollow housing with approximately 3/16 walls and there were three pieces knocked out of one side but only two pieces were found. I burned the oil out of the housing and the pieces with an O/A torch, then sand blasted everything to remove the residue. Parts were very clean when I went to welding. Since I had no idea of settings, I consulted the Miller book and based on that, I used a 3/32 electrode, on AC, continuous hi-frequency, at about 125 amps and 15 cfh of argon with a #6 gas cup (I have a 250 amp Synchrowave AC/DC machine). Unfortunately, all I have is 2% Thorium electrodes and the book said pure Tungsten or 2% Zirconium is better. However, I still got a nice ball on the end and the arc seemed normal. The problem is that the sides of the weld would not close up even when stirring with the filler rod and there were lots of little pin holes and black speckles in the weld. In addition, the material flowed to the inside of the casting so I got ugly blobs under the weld. I suppose a backup would have been better but almost impossible to put inside a rough casting and make contact over the whole surface. I also believe that I should have been able to weld 3/16 without support as that is pretty substantial material. I finally slathered enough weld metal on top of the breaks that a little mound was built up and it did not break when I ground it down so maybe the weld took. Unfortunately, I still have to add a blank to replace the piece that was never located and I am dreading trying to weld that. So here are my questions: 1. Do I really need pure Tungsten or 2% Z - or - can I use the 2% Th with AC? 2. Is there anything else obvious that I could try to get better welds? It took way longer than it should and made a mess plus I know TIG does a better job than this. |
| |||
|
I have heard that the naked eye has never seen clean alum. used castings are noturious for not being able to clean good enough and the sand blasting probally was not a good idea as it more than likely impregnated the alum with sand. But I must confess ( I am not a welder ) Mike Tanner
__________________ Give out before you give up. If it was easy anybody could do it. |
| |||
|
None of your problems sound unusual for cast Al. Aluminum is difficult to weld at best, and casting alloys contain many impurities. Start with a new stainless steel wire brush. Brush the work severely, imediately before welding, and between passes. Only use pure tungsten, and check the alloy of your filler rod. Be very careful grinding Al, unless you have a disc made for Al. The main problem with welding Al is aluminum oxide, which has a much higher melting point than Al. I think your amp setting is rather low, but I wasn't there either. Some cast weld well, some do not. Remember that Al is a very good conductor of heat.
|
| ||||
|
I weld lots of castings and I only use 2% thoriated tungsten (yes shame on me for not using pure - only been doing this 20+ yrs). Castings can be a problem - use the lowest settings to still do the job to help with porosity - still it can be a big problem to get a sound weld on something that acts like your trying to weld a sponge. all I can say is you don't learn this overnight - and it takes awhile to get comfortable with castings of aluminum. - motor cases are bad because of the oil impregnation. Take your time and don't rush it by putting to much heat into it - like i said use a lower amperage to slowly do your weld - those pin hole areas are small gas pockets from casting (correct me if I'm wrong) and a high amperage just makes it harder to fill them. - Don't know what else to say but practice and more practice. Most general castings of aluminum are best welded with 4043 from what I've found - as it gives a good liquid flow of the weld - JK
Last edited by jeremy k; 07-07-2008 at 12:15 AM. |
| ||||
|
Jeremy k; you are right all the way, but even with your years of experience I am going to have to disagree about the high amperage harder to get rid of porosity. I have found that as long as you keep the puddle liquid until it gets a smooth silver finish.
__________________ The mind is nothing without the body and the body is nothing without the mind. You need them both to make the rational decisions we so make every day. Some we don't put as much thought into them as we should, and others we take a little too seriously. So slow down, take a breather, and think. |
| |||
|
I am using a foot controller and the panel is set at 125. I tried a 1/8 electrode and burned it away on the first pass so went to the 3/32. I also tried higher amperage but the material started collapsing so I backed off on the current. I have the sine wave knob at 3 - I went down to 2 and up to 5 but 3 seemed the most stable. I agree that my gas flow is probably low and I may need a larger gas cup. I did get the "silver puddle" but the thing that seemed odd to me was that the sides of the joint pushed apart (sort of like Moses parting the Red Sea). I'm used to steel and titanium wanting to cross the weld root with a little extra rod but the aluminum didn't want to cooperate. Another thing I did which probably wasn't code was to run the arc all around the weld and melt the lumps a little more. I need to get a refill on an O2 bottle anyway so will pick up some 4043 rod at the welding store tomorrow. This housing is off a Japanese Miyano CNC lathe and the dealer wanted $4000 for a replacement - hence the request to have me fix it for the few hundred bucks I'll charge them. I'm quite sure this thing is oil soaked because that's exactly what it does - an oil catcher for the back of the spindle where the bar enters. Thanks for the suggestions - I'll let you know how it turns out. |
| |||
|
Reading your responce gave me some more insight or posibly another idea. One thing that makes me wonder, is after you burned away the 1/8 electrode, how did changing to a smaller electrode help? Aside form that, Al welds differently from other metals. Al's rate of thermal conductivity is second only to copper. This is why so much more heat is required to establish a puddle. However, as the welding progesses, less heat is required to maintain said puddle. I have to second hillbillysmiths suggestion that you use a higher heat setting at the machine. Stomp the petal to get the puddle started, then back off the heat to just enough to maintain the puddle. As the work heats up you will need less pedal. The phenomenon of the side of the weld pulling away is usualy caused by the fact that the melting temp of aluminum oxide(which continuously forms on the surface)has a MUCH higher melting temp than Al, so by the time you burn through the oxide, the Al under the oxide has melted away. Hence the need to vigorously wire brush the work with a new s.s wire brush. Also, if possible, practice some on some Al srap, just to get a feel for the heat input needed for fusion. Lastly, it is perfectly ok to weld over your previous beads and melt the lumps together. But then I've only been welding Al for 30 years so take it with a grain of salt.
|
| |||
|
Though you can get away with 2% Thoriated tungsten it is not normally recommended. This is due to the fact that Thoriated tungsten will crack when subjected to use with alternating current. These cracks (sometimes microscopic sometimes quite large) can cause several small balls to form on the end of the electrode instead of one large sphere. These small balls and or micro fractures on the end of the electrode can cause the arc to be unfocused, thereby causing the arc to wander and jump from edge of joint to edge of joint requiring slightly higher amperages to gain stability. It is for this reason that most welding equipment manufacturers recommend the use of pure, zirconiated, or ceriated tungsten for any AC application. Pure tungsten has a low melting temp and though approved for AC welding has a tendency to form a small molten ball on the end of the electrode that can sometimes drop in to the weld metal causing what is called a tungsten inclusion (which like a chip in a wind shield can eventually lead to cracking of the weld), and it can not be used for DC welding. Zirconiated tungsten is used to apply high quality (x-ray quality) welds on aluminum and Magnesium. This is because the addition of zirconium stabilizes the arc and raises the melting temp of the tungsten to help reduce the chances of a dreaded inclusion showing up in the X-ray of a weld that you just spent two days working on. Now on to ceriated (My general recommendation for anyone with a TIG machine). Ceriated tungsten is one of the only tungsten recommended for use on both AC and DC. It is for this reason that I suggest it. Instead of having to wonder if you have retrieved the right type of tungsten (after the paint has worn, ground, or been burned of the end) you know that if all you have is ceriated then you can do no wrong. Another point of interest is that Thoriated tungsten is slightly radioactive (look up thorium on the periodic table of elements). As far as the rest of the procedure you are following, all sounds fairly normal. One rule of thumb is to use 1 amp of power for each decimal of base material thickness. For example, if you are working on 1/8 inch that is .125 so 125 amps is a good starting point, or 1/4 inch .250 inch 250 amps. I know it sounds high but the extra power is needed in order to establish the puddle due to aluminums ability to quickly absorb heat (high thermal conductivity). One thing to remember, though, is that once the puddle has formed and the work piece has reached welding temperature you will have to reduce your amperage significantly (let off of the petal) in order to keep the puddle from falling through or becoming far to wide (sometimes called hot short). When you get it right you will find that you have the puddle kind of balanced on the tip of your toe, foot goes 1/4 inch down puddle grows, foot comes up 1/4 inch puddle freezes. When you reach this point you are driving the puddle, not the other way around. It is here that you get to take your time and put the metal where you want it, drop by drop. I would definitely recommend a much larger cup (around a 9) to ensure adequate weld puddle coverage. From everything else it sounds like you are on the right track. Clean Clean and Clean some more be patient and gently work over any spots where you can see porosity as you are welding along and you can normally get them to close up. If not Grind or otherwise remove the contaminant causing the bubbles (using aluminum approved abrasives or grinder wheels) and make another pass. It takes a lot of patience. Good luck
__________________ Lost Arts Forge and Metalworks |
| |||
|
Arftist, I made a typo mistake in my second post. I meant to say that I had used a 1/16 electrode on the first attempt with a 3/32 on the next try. Thanks again to all and I'll post results...Hollis |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|